how about ONLY for Mayoral candidates and all local politicians and appointees
4 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
I see the constant Bickering and child like controversy's are still going on in Gloversville with the Mayor and the Common Council, if this kind of Non-sense continues Gloversville is going to remain in the shape it is now, high taxes, loads of blight, I could list more but what good will it do, we all know what the problems are.
3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
portney. that should be a no vote. and your responce should be., *****no because it won't apply to ?????
double standards.. just another reason to get out on alection day and REVOLT
3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
I am torn about this issue. I lost a sister to a drunk driver growing up. I'm not sure the answer is .05, but I do think anyone that registers above .20 should face felony charges and jail time for a first offense.
3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
This is nothing but a revenue stream fro the states. In 1980 when the NHTSA started keeping statistics, 35% of all highway fatalities involved alcohol. Now 30 years later, the ratio is still at 35%. These Draconian drunken driving laws are not doing what they expect. All they do is ruin peoples lives without saving any.
Next, BAC is a Horrible test of drunkenness. One who drinks daily can easily perform just fine at BACs as high as 5.0%. The occasional drinker can be dysfunctional at 0.5%.
The real problem is that we hand out drivers licences like candy at Halloween. The number of ignorant and unqualified drivers on the roads are the real problem... Address that.
9 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
might as well add a 28th amendment to the Constitution re-instating the 18th amendment. Here we go again attacking the symptoms and not the problem.
6 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
I am not a drinker but give more chances for government to invade a persons life... no thanks!
7 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
drugsrus, once again your comment makes no sense. The 18th outlawed the production, transport and sale of alcohol illegal, but did NOT outlaw the consumption or possession of it.
This has absolutely nothing to do with blood alcohol levels or driving while intoxicated.
You keep inventing arguments for this that simply do not exist. Stop running interference.
3 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
All cars should have sensors that render the vehicle inoperable if alcohol is detected in the driver. All cell phones should have a lock out for text messaging if the phone is moving at more than 5 MPH. Both drunk driving and texting while driving put innocent people at risk.
6 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Seeing that Governor Cuomo is no longer married to a Kennedy I'm sure he will support this bill.
4 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Hilltopper, that's a proposed law, and a very intrusive one at that. I'm not a heavy drinker and I've never been arrested for drunk driving. But I know my limits and when to let a friend or family member take the keys. So why should I have my privacy invaded for doing something as common as driving?
And who's going to calibrate the sensor? Only certain people by law are allowed to do that considering the results may be used in court.
H-ell, there are certain mouthwashes that will yield results based on your breath, not the content in yur blood. That's grossly unfair and and imprudent approach to fight this.
6 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
The Mayor would have to show up to work if anything is to get done. You can't run a City from Facebook or a bar stool. Jim Handy is a good man that will show up to work and improve our City.
1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
swizzer, -failed again- It has been a few years since there has been alcohol in mouthwash. And let's look into your analsys - production, transport, and sale is illegal - but not consumption or possession -- OK how do you legally possess or ingest something that can't be made, carried, or sold. And back then blood alcohol levels and DUI/DWI were not of concern. Most times the cop who pulled you over took your keys and simply gave you a ride home. You could pick up your car keys at the police station the next day and everybody had a good laugh at your condition the night before.
And that amendment put an end to "legal" licensed production. Those illegal moonshiners who have been around for a couple of hundred years are still at it today and they have guns too.
2 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
drugsrus, no YOU'RE incorrect: look at the active ingredients in most mouthwashes (not those weak ones that taste better than they work) and find anything ending in -ol, to mean it contains the necessary hydroxyl -OH group in ALL alcohols. Not all alcohols are of the drinking found in beer kind you know.
drugs, you're still wrong about Prohibition, so let's spell it out to de-mystify what those drugs have done to your mind:
"The Eighteenth Amendment (Amendment XVIII) of the United States Constitution effectively established the prohibition of alcoholic beverages in the United States by declaring the production, transport and sale of (though not the consumption or private possession of) alcohol illegal. The separate Volstead Act set down methods of enforcing the Eighteenth Amendment, and defined which "intoxicating liquors" were prohibited, and which were excluded from prohibition (e.g., for medical and religious purposes)."
swizzer, you need to go back to "See spot run". Unless you are using JD, or JW for mouthwash everything I see in the drug store says on the label - "alcohol free" - Listerine, Scope, and the rest.
You still haven't told me how I can possess and consume something that can't be manufactured, transported or sold. I'll wait but I won't hold my breath.
The answer is still NO
2 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
drugs and rs...you both should be tired of and embarrased by the "I'm right and you're wrong" exchanges you go through everyday. It's childish and no one cares
2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
The heck with the B.A.C. Lets get a coffee pot.
4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Wonder if the county has an extra one laying around?
2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
according to the nys dmv website we have a dwai law. you can get arrested for .05 up to .08 lets enforce the laws we have. this should not be an issue for this state.
2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Actually drugsrus there is Alcohol in todays mouthwashes as well. Go check the ingredients of Listerine.
"I can possess and consume something that can't be manufactured, transported or sold."
You make it yourself....DUH!!!
Lower it and we'll see even more DWI Lawyer ads on TV. Look at the ones that continually get arrested for DWI 5, 6, 7 times but got off due to the lawyer. One of these days those lawyers will have to live with the fact that they helped kill someone when their repeat client finally kills someone!
2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Taxtired, Sorry no coffee, the pot was stolen!
No matter who made it, it was not supposed to have been made. Prohibition was a great example of an overreaching government... isn't history is supposed to teach us something? Then Twenty-first Amendment repealed the Eighteenth Amendment. However, United States federal law still prohibits the manufacture of distilled spirits without meeting numerous licensing requirements that make it impractical to produce spirits for personal beverage use. So you couldn't make it for yourself...
1 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
8 East Fulton St. , Gloversville, NY 12078 | 518-725-8616