Mobile Version: mobile.leaderherald.com
RSS:
Gloversville Weather Forecast, NY
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified Web
Local News | In Brief | Business | Editorials | Obituaries | Local Sports | Welcome Home- | Autos360 | Blogs | CU Galleries | Local Classifieds

Send message to state, schools

POSTED: May 18, 2008

Many local school district budgets for 2008-09 include tax-levy increases of between 2 percent and 4 percent. Those painful increases are bad enough, but two local districts have gone over the top with their proposed tax levies.

When voters in the Gloversville and Broadalbin-Perth districts go to the polls Tuesday, they’ll decide on school budgets containing 7 percent tax-levy increases.

Any property tax jump will be difficult for people who already are struggling with rising costs of fuel, food and other products, services, fees and taxes. The 7 percent increases are out of line and should be rejected.

Not that rejection will make much of a difference in Gloversville. If voters turn down the budget in that district, the school board likely would approve a contingency budget containing roughly the same levy increase.

Still, voters should cast their no votes, if only to send this message to state and local education officials: The state is forcing too many costly programs onto local schools, and school boards aren’t doing enough to reduce the spending they can control.

Gloversville voters should be particularly upset. The district’s property owners pay one of the highest school tax rates in the area. After the Gloversville district adopted its tentative budget, state Sen. Hugh T. Farley, R-Niskayuna, secured an additional $200,000 in aid. Instead of applying at least some of that money to reduce the tax levy, the Gloversville school board said it would put all of it into the fund balance. Adding to that reserve account may be sound financial practice, but the taxpayers are desperate for a break. If the district could have managed without the higher fund balance when it approved the tentative budget, it could have safely applied some of the additional $200,000 to lower the levy.

Other districts that also received the extra state “bullet aid” through Farley will use it to lower their tax levies. The Greater Johnstown School District, for example, says it will use its $50,000 in additional aid to cut its proposed tax-levy increase from 2.7 percent to 2 percent. The St. Johnsville Central School District will use its additional $22,407 to reduce its 1.6 percent tax-levy increase to zero.

Voters are in charge. If they think skyrocketing taxes are having a negative effect on their lives and community, they should make sure their state and local leaders know it.

But regardless of their opinions on the budgets, we urge people to get out and vote Tuesday.
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-25 |26-26 | Post a comment
MountainMan
05-29-08 10:11 PM
Hey, if you don't agree with what the school board is doing, get on the ballot and put yourself on the hot seat. Oops. I forgot that it requires WORK and giving up a lifetime hobby of being an armchair critic.

If you complain, run, otherwise sit in the shadows and be a coward.

teebzz
05-23-08 3:33 PM
is justforfun correcting someones nickname?

MountainMan
05-20-08 8:55 PM
I think the story meant a one-time increase, not overall, like I was assuming. Meaning, no other local school district is facing a 6.99% increase or higher this time around.

Whoops, sorry.

FireKatt
05-20-08 8:30 PM
MountainMan I realize you are a new kid here and Annarondac has been here longer as I have and I have never known her to lie about anything all her comments, like them or not, are true to the bone. I don't always agree with her but I certainly wouldn't call her a liar. And yes it was on the Tuesday morning news.

MountainMan
05-20-08 8:01 PM
Annarondac, stop lying, no really.

Gloversville does not have the highest taxes in the State. For instance, when comparing it to school property taxes, the district has a rate of $22.42 per thousand of assessed value. Taxpayers in Schenectady have a rate of 31.60, about 50% more than Gloversville.

Would you rather live in Schenectady? I think not. Go back to spinning your lies.

justforfun
05-20-08 4:31 PM
architect and adirondack (proper) get the real facts before bashing....besides being the right thing to do..it also influences the 12 people that participat here. of course you could do all of us a favor and move to another community ---i'm sure your wisdom and creative solutions will be appreciated. i really enjoy you faux intelligence...the deeper you go the funnier it gets...God Bless America and it's free speech!

livehereworkhere
05-20-08 9:39 AM
So much negative is going around about GESD I thought that maybe it is time for an accurate and positive comment. Check this out! They have over 90% participation in the 25 book reading incentive program. English language assessment scores for grades 3-5 have risen 10 points from last year. The middle school has over 300 students on the honor roll and Principals list each quarter. The number of students graduating with regents diplomas has risen from less than 70% in 2003 to over 90%. Gloversville is recognized nationally and thought NYS for reading intervention which significantly reduces referrals to special education. As a Gloversville tax payer I personally would like to thank the administration for supplying me with the hard facts. It was amazing the look on their faces when I went in and asked to see some positive things that were going on.

justforfun
05-20-08 9:24 AM
Tea party was in Boston right? maybe you'll find a less expensive cost of living there...Bye. other than complain on this lame 'blog'--have you ever been involved in soultions or just point out where everyone else fails? just curious.

Annarondac
05-20-08 7:53 AM
On the news this morning, Channel 10, Albany reported that Goversville has the highest taxes in the State. We have a low graduation rate, 68% yet they want more money? Dissolve the school system and start anew. TheArchitect had a good point. People can also change their mortgages putting taxes in escrow, which would slow the pace of funds going into the school system.

As I stated in a prior post, I think it's time for a tea party.

TheArchitect
05-19-08 10:46 PM
'Justforfun', you certain don't have any background in our legal system, especially the timing of such legal action against homeowners. The county can't "go after" the homeowner for at least 15 months after the taxes are due. At that time, the solution is to pay your taxes to simply remove the legal liability. The issue here is getting local leaders to recognize that people due have a voice. They count on apathy, but the system is fragile. The Gloversville Enlarged School District has such a poor performance with unnecessary high taxes. At least in Broadalbin-Perth, the district continues to grow, property values continue to grow, and it is a district that people are flocking to. At the GESD, it is like rats fleeing a sinking ship while the captain is unaware he has scuttled his own ship. Stop drinking the cool aid.

wirlwind
05-19-08 5:06 PM
Again, all of you who are in favor of tax increases, are you land owners?

justforfun
05-19-08 2:29 PM
Hoop---i don't get your idea...last yr was 0%. Are you suggesting that a school district reduce it's tax levy by the exact amount of increase from one year to the next? That is absurd. what budget philosophy is that? where do people come from? You are right --schools have failed if they produced 'thinkers' like you!

justforfun
05-19-08 2:22 PM
how much does being an ignoramous cost? I really can't believe(well yes I can) the amount of stupidty presented form time to time on this forum....ARCHITECT you should really do some homework---if people don't pay their taxes --the county pays it then goes after the local homeowner...but your idea is simply brilliant...what a rebel....void of thought.

EasyEJ
05-19-08 12:49 PM
Relax everyone! nothing is getting resolved by playing defense, let's have a common meeting to all that want a positive budget along with the Children's best interest. Anyone wanting to Chair the Meeting?

CommonCents
05-19-08 10:05 AM
Hey FrankP...who are you referring to? Now it's all a conspiracy?...Board members don't get paid....they work for FREE and are constintly second guessed by people who know nothing of the budget or the district business......who are you calling out?? which district??

CommonCents
05-19-08 10:00 AM
It's incredible that the Leader Herald KNOWS what everyone should do.....but where was BECK and FONDA during the process?? Hiding behind an editorial. It's easy to play Monday Morning Quarterback....

FrankP
05-18-08 5:29 PM
I must say, only people interested in saving the existing school systems are running for school boards. I have already served three years and fought for cuts. My experience, most board members are collecting salaries from near by school districts, have very special interest in the one they are now serving on and are not in the lease interest of making waves but only to get their special interest served.

Hoopoe
05-18-08 1:07 PM
Hey Mtn Man, as costs go up, you cut your services to get a 0% increase. Base your budget on last years budget, which was way too high, and work backwards, and make the cuts necessary to make it work. A simple example is that each elementary school does not need assistant or vice principal and their secretaries. These are luxuaries and can be cut. The time of this administration "going along to get along" has to come to and end.

TheArchitect
05-18-08 9:27 AM
If the taxpayers want thing to change, they have an option. If 20% or more of the tax payers would refuse to pay their school and property taxes, the system would fail. Given the existing laws, it would take over a year for the legal system to catch up, and they you would only have to pay your taxes (unlike income taxes at the federal and state level that are ready to deal with non-payers). This silent solidarity would result in a system that could not sustain itself without our money for very long and then a major change in philosphy would be required.

taxpayer2
05-18-08 9:12 AM
Do we realy need vice principles

wirlwind
05-18-08 8:15 AM
Also, our elementary schools only have half of the bathrooms open. Looks like we need more managers.

wirlwind
05-18-08 8:12 AM
sat - say

wirlwind
05-18-08 8:11 AM
With only a 68% graduation rate, I would sat the schools are suffering a D average. Why throw money away like this.

KeLeMi
05-18-08 7:42 AM
I'm retired and on a fixed income. I need a tax increase like I need a hole in the head.

optionsmonster
05-18-08 7:21 AM
It is apparent that school districts take voters for granted. They continue to pass costs on to the taxpayer and the increases projected for this years budget show the lack of prudent fiscal responsibility. Any district that proposes an increase should see their budget defeated. Taxpayers should send a loud message---enough is enough!! It is a slap in the face to every taxpayer that our school districts can't cut costs effectively. They all go crying to Hugh Farley for more aid and one day he won't be there to secure it. The quality of education continues to come up short to the expectations and trowing good money after a bad investment will never work!

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
Local News | In Brief | Business | Editorials | Obituaries | Local Sports | Welcome Home- | Autos360 | Blogs | CU Galleries | Local Classifieds