District to apply aid to fund balance, not tax levy
By RODNEY MINOR, The Leader-HeraldArticle Photos
Fact Box
Budget highlightsThe following are highlights from the Gloversville Enlarged School District’s 2008-09 budget proposal:
• $50.6 million budget
• 6.9 percent tax-levy increase
• Staffing cuts, including the removal of three librarians
• Program cuts, including seventh-grade modified sports
• Public hearing scheduled for today at 7 p.m. in the middle school auditorium
• Vote scheduled for May 20 from noon to 9 p.m.
After some discussion, the majority of the district’s Board of Education agreed at its meeting Monday the best thing to do may not be the most popular option.
Board President Katherine Hillock said the majority of the school board apparently felt the money should be saved and put in the fund balance so the school district could decide how to use it in the future.
“We need to spend the money wisely,” Hillock said. “And we need more time to decide how to do that.”
A $50.6 million proposed budget for the 2008-09 school year was put forward by the school board last month. It contains a 6.9 percent tax-levy increase, along with staffing and program cuts.
School officials said those cuts were directly related to receiving $118,000 less than expected in state aid and being put under a state program that includes requirements on where certain aid can be spent.
To make up for part of the shortfall and the state program, Farley secured $200,000 in aid for the school district earlier this month. The money was part of approximately $500,000 in aid secured by Farley for schools in his Senate district. The Greater Johnstown School District used $50,000 secured by Farley to reduce its
tax-levy increase.
Gloversville school board members went a different route.
District voters in Gloversville have rejected initial budget proposals the last two years. The first 2006-07 budget proposal contained a 6.9 percent tax-levy increase. A later proposal passed when the tax-levy increase was reduced to 3.5 percent.
Last year, the 2007-08 budget proposal contained about a 2 percent tax-levy increase, but also was voted down. Voters later approved a $46.8 million proposal which contained no tax-levy increase.
Board member Gino Calandra said the board’s decision last year to go to a budget with no increase led to the cuts and tax-levy increase in this year’s budget proposal. The school district already has taken $500,000 out of money it planned to put in its fund balance this year to even out the budget proposal. If the fund balance is not maintained, it could put the district in a huge hole, Calandra said.
The fund balance is the school district’s savings, he said, meant for use on a rainy day.
School officials have said the proposed fund balance will be 2 percent to 3 percent of the total budget.
Superintendent Robert DeLilli said the state recommends school districts keep their fund balance at approximately 4 percent of the total budget.
For this school year, the district may finish with a fund balance of about $600,000, he said. That would put the fund balance at just over 1 percent of the budget, according to DeLilli.
“If there is an influx of special education students, we must pay for services by borrowing money if we cannot take it out of fund balance,” he said. “Which means you end up paying interest you should not have to.”
While a few of the school board members spoke in favor of using part of the $200,000 to reduce the proposed tax-levy increase, only Stanley DeVoe seemed to be in favor of using the entire amount.
DeVoe said many people have no more money to put toward paying school taxes. The school district will not be able to go back to the well, he said, because they will discover the well has gone dry.
Board member Harry Wiggins said a secure fund balance would help reduce future tax levies. The future of the school district would be best served by putting the money into the district’s depleted fund balance, he said.
Before too many people are critical of the money not being used to reduce the tax levy, Wiggins suggested, “walk a mile in my shoes.”
“We are making progress [in the school district], but it will come over a long period of time,” he said.
Only one board member, Frank Carangelo, voted against the budget proposal when it was adopted by the school board.
Carangelo said the amount of the budget is too high, and using the aid money to cut the tax levy would not do anything about that.
The school district needs a strong fund balance, Carangelo said, and he will continue to fight the battle for a smaller budget next year.
Farley spokesman Dave Smingler said the $200,000 in “bullet” aid is like other aid and can be used at the school board’s discretion.
Farley’s preference is using the money to hold down taxes when possible, Smingler said, but that is up to the school district.
For school district residents who want to share their opinion or get more information on the budget proposal, a public hearing will start at 7 p.m. today in the middle school auditorium.
Business Manager Steve Schloicka said he will show a PowerPoint presentation on the budget and answer questions.
The budget vote will be May 20 from noon to 9 p.m.
A separate proposition also is on the ballot to buy two new school buses.
Voters also will decide between four candidates for three school board seats.
Rodney Minor covers Gloversville. He can be reached at gloversville@leaderherald.com.
|
MountainMan
|
|
|---|---|
|
05-16-08 12:44 PM
|
If Senator Farley had $200,000 to give to the school district, he could have applied that amount to LOWER State taxes. He could have done that on his own without local approval.
|
|
TheArchitect
|
|
|
05-14-08 10:05 PM
|
This board's misguidance can be changed if enough people contact Senator Farley's office and voice their concerns. I spoke with Senator Farley and he was clear that this bulllet aid money was intended to go toward tax reduction and not to line the coffers of the districts fund balance to pilfer at a later date. He will make the necessary change if people standup and share their viewpoints. Senator Farley can be reached as his Johnstown District Office.
|
|
BPJessica
|
|
|
05-14-08 1:33 PM
|
Nothing against Stan Devoe, but the Leader sure finds a few friends to constantly photograph...
|
|
rsoxfan33
|
|
|
05-14-08 12:47 PM
|
justforf, i read mountainman's post..The one thing it does not say is how many of those properties are assesed low due to the fact it is run down, empty lot, or is own by the coutny due to forcloser..when your property is worth little or nothing of course you pay less and that brings the average down..if you try to keep your property looking nice you pay through the nose..look at the taxes per $1000.00 to get a better idea of what is paid. P.s. name calling is never a sign of intelligence..
|
|
justforfun
|
|
|
05-14-08 11:32 AM
|
...and after you feel real good and powerful 'bnout your no vote ---maybe the Boe can make you feel better by going to 15% leagally and w/the great state of ny's blessing...well done naysayers...beautiful well thought out reaction...losers.
|
|
justforfun
|
|
|
05-14-08 11:28 AM
|
redsuksfan...beantown or bust...later for you and your poisonous, sour, ignorant comments....take a look at mountainmans note....still feeling good?
|
|
CommonCents
|
|
|
05-14-08 10:35 AM
|
GREAT point Mountain Man....and Dave, being a businessman you dissapoint me...you don't think the increased costs you talk about effect the school too?? hmmm???
|
|
rsoxfan33
|
|
|
05-14-08 10:16 AM
|
justforfunk,... maybe we can give up food,gas and heating oil on top of the scratch offs, beer and cigs. then we all would have enough money to pay outragous taxes.i will be paying close to $2000.00 in school taxe this year. FOR WHAT? kids who can't pass standard tests.(which cost us more money.) maybe you believe the BOE's line of BS, but as long as i am paying that kind of money i will have an opinion on how it is spent..i will be voting NO.. P.s. i can't move because my property is overtaxed and overvalued in a crappy market.
|
|
MountainMan
|
|
|
05-14-08 10:16 AM
|
Have we forgotten that cuts have already been to the school budget: 1) Four full-time positions eliminated 2) 16% to 20% increase in individual health insurance premiums 3) Loss of modified sports programs 4) 80% reduction in extracurricular activities Every other school district in the Capital Region has higher property taxes, and are able to keep all their programs. To see how cheap it is to live here, take a look at the average residential property school tax (data provided per parcel): Johnstown - $553 Broadalbin-Perth - $1,084 Oppenheim-Ephratah - $503 Northville - $1,312 Wheelerville - $773 Mayfield - $1,141 Amsterdam - $690 Canajoharie - $803 Fonda - $856 Fort Plain - $845 Wells - $903 Gloversville - a WHOPPING $423 The residents of the school district fail to recognize the fact that everyone else around them is paying more for taxes. If you don't believe me, take a look at our resident critic, Jack Kinzie. He moved here JUST to have a cheaper house AN
|
|
justforfun
|
|
|
05-14-08 9:57 AM
|
wirlwind---you summer here? you must be wealthy enough to own two homes? sell one. then you can vote where you LIVE. ronadack..ya i 'own land...and a house'...cut the scratch offs, cigs and beer not monthly...weekly and tax is covered. not to mention STAR and prop tax rebate...remember those? course not...you received them in October--just before elections. if you are sooooooooo unhappy here....move... it's free will but make sure ya vote NO before you leave...that will make the community better and certainly make for great press
|
|
Griffin
|
|
|
05-14-08 6:44 AM
|
Im voting NO
|
|
Griffin
|
|
|
05-14-08 6:35 AM
|
Im sure glad to see all the input, I know we just can't take anymore. I have children in school and want them to get a good Ed. I get a 1st hand look at what the GSD spending money on. Trips to other states... come ON !!! Put that money back into our community at least !!! Did thay forget about GAS PRICES !!! My well is dry, and I wondering what I will do when my tax goes higher than it is now! It is to bad that jobs have to be cut, If the teacher want they jobs to stay in place then everyone of them need to take a look at where the money is going , better yet where is it coming from.
|
|
fenny23
|
|
|
05-13-08 9:55 PM
|
Its very simple. I am voting no.
|
|
Annarondac
|
|
|
05-13-08 7:10 PM
|
Right on Dave.
|
|
DaveGibson
|
|
|
05-13-08 6:17 PM
|
Hooray for Stan DeVoe! "DeVoe said many people have no more money to put toward paying school taxes. The school district will not be able to go back to the well, he said, because they will discover the well has gone dry." I agree with Stan. The district had to cut jobs and programs because things were so tight with the loss of $118k in state aid. Farley comes on his white horse with a sack of gold worth $200k. Does the school reinstate programs or jobs? Or better yet, reduce the 6.9% tax increase? No. Local folk are having a hard time, with high gas and energy bills, increasing grocery bills, and so on. If an opportunity comes along to save the taxpayers money, the school should take it. Good on ya, Stan.
|
|
livehereworkhere
|
|
|
05-13-08 5:01 PM
|
Here is a twist not mentioned.. In order to serve on the school board you must live in the district and therefore pay taxes to the district so… wouldn’t the school board members look to keep from paying higher taxes themselves if they could? Just my two cents.
|
|
Pamela
|
|
|
05-13-08 4:41 PM
|
Who is playing on Sunday? The field was empty, no games, but the li8ghts were on! That's my ax dollar being spent on wasteful nimo bills! where else can things be turned off, cut back, save a dollar here and ten dollars there. School is meant for education, not lighting sports fields on days when there is NO program going on!
|
|
Annarondac
|
|
|
05-13-08 4:17 PM
|
Just, are you a land owner? Is anyone that favors increased taxation a land owner? If you are not, then I truly understand where you are coming from.
|
|
wirlwind
|
|
|
05-13-08 4:01 PM
|
Then lets have booster clubs for everything extra than what is required for graduating.
|
|
CommonCents
|
|
|
05-13-08 3:52 PM
|
Pamela; I beleive the school district charges for games to offset the cost of the lights. I'm also very sure that the booster clubs for football and baseball contribute money for the cost...again...so the kids can play AND watch. These kinds of events give other children a place to go and display school spirit.
|
|
Pamela
|
|
|
05-13-08 3:46 PM
|
The district needs to take some hard looks at it's extra-curricuylar, and that means sports as much as it means the other clubs. School is a place for learning first and extras are just that.. extras. I came by Park Terrace school last Sunday and the lights were on! I could see them all the way from FMCC.. that is a huge waste of taxpayer money! There are many, many areas that can be cut back. Lets get back to education.
|
|
wirlwind
|
|
|
05-13-08 3:35 PM
|
I'm a seasonal resident so I can't serve on the boards or I would. Also I am taxed, but I have no representation. That is not very fair also. Plus I volunteer for numerous organizations, I do go to board meetings, and I do monitor city council meetings. I do have a question to the middle school. Why are half the bathrooms closed and locked up at the middle school, where the children cannot access bathrooms in time to get to class. Many are late for class because they have to hunt for bathrooms that are shut down or locked. There are many more instances as this going on that I have addresses but find no answers. The only lame rhetoric I get is "It's for the children." Well if it were they would have access to bathrooms, at least.
|
|
justforfun
|
|
|
05-13-08 3:04 PM
|
...a few less scratch offs, a few less cartons of cigs and a few gallons less of beer...would more than cover any tax increase!
|
|
justforfun
|
|
|
05-13-08 3:03 PM
|
rsoxfan---why don't you move.....and get a transfusion while you're at it...toilet paper would be good too---love the ignorance
|
|
EyeMan
|
|
|
05-13-08 2:27 PM
|
"Stan Devoe always makes it into the paper... " There is probably a good reason for that.
|


