Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS

Ground attacks will win fight

August 15, 2014

Islamic State terrorists poised to conquer Iraq will suffer from U.S. airstrikes — but that will not be enough to defeat them. Only attacks on the ground can do that....

« Back to Article

sort: oldest | newest




Aug-17-14 10:20 PM

Bob, that is what Obama said. He said her statements were bull poop! For once I believe that they both just MIGHT be right!

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Aug-17-14 5:31 PM

What did we do to win WWII? We used two atomic bombs. To whom? Our enemy who was killing us as well. What did Japan do? Surrender. The current president campaigned on getting out of Iraq, but not winning. Radical Islamists, what do they want to do? Kill us. What do we do? Try to talk sense into them. That's loosing and our children will suffer the terrorism as well as their children until someone comes along to win. That means destroy our enemies. Then they surrender.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Aug-16-14 8:02 PM

Thank you MrBob for providing us with your wisdom.

1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Aug-16-14 7:40 AM

Don't believe a word Hagatha Clinton says...she wants to be President and will say anything and throw anyone under the bus to achieve her goal. Don't fall for the worm turning act. Whether a leftist is drivin by ignorance, apathy or greed they all have one thing in common...they lie. The ignorant lib lies to preserve self-delusional beliefs; the apathetic leftist lies to excuse their lifestyle and the malicious progressive leader lies to keep their power base ignorant and apathetic. Now, how do you negotiate with cultists who's only desire is to kill you? Discuss which limb they cut off first? Arm the Iraqi Army?? They just crap and run. A Flight of B-52's with their bellys full of 500 pounders following ISIS wherever they go sends an unambiguous message. We have the strength and the means but no leader with resolve. Obama only gives 'talk' when instead clear vision is needed. Being nothing more than a Community Organizer and Fundraiser-in-Chief he is incapable of decisive action. Sad

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Aug-15-14 9:59 PM

Sadly that statement is true. But it would not have been necessary if ABO (Anyone But Obama) was president. Even old lefty Hillary has come forward saying that Obama policies are wrong and that his actions have harmed American interests. Obama continues to be wrong both domestically and on foreign policies. I am very sorry that he got that second term... it has severely crippled the USA in a moment in time that the world could really use a leader. Even a weak leader would be better.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 5 of 5 comments

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
Remember my email address.


I am looking for:
News, Blogs & Events Web