Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS

Stay sober behind wheel

December 3, 2013

With the holiday season upon us, it’s appropriate to once again consider the very serious dangers of drunken driving and driving while impaired by drugs, be they illegal or prescription....

« Back to Article

sort: oldest | newest




Dec-08-13 3:24 PM

Used, it looks like you still having comprehension problems... use a DICTIONARY so you can stay up on the discussions. Come on sweetie you can do it! And apparently you are right about one thing, you can't fix stupid! But do not give up... baby steps... small ones!

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Dec-05-13 7:08 AM

Both drugs and TOT seem to support overindulgence with their posts here. As drugs has said many times in this forum, you can't fix stupid

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Dec-04-13 1:38 PM

It's a small wonder that any bars are still able to survive financially with the way "they" have been cracking down, and the self appointed cell phone brigade constantly calling to report anything that might be considered "suspicious" behavior.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Dec-04-13 7:02 AM

"undue hardship on the offenders"?'s a due hardship

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Dec-03-13 2:43 PM

Thank you for the miss leading information Scarecrow. In 1980 the total deaths due to auto accidents were 51,091. In 2012 the total deaths due to auto accidents were 34,080. That’s with a substantial increase in the total miles driven in the US. The percent of the total number of deaths may be the same but the total number of deaths has decreased by 33%. Also, the attitude in 1980 was to let someone go if they appeared to have had “just a few” or they were just a few blocks from home. Also, people of status would be driven home and no ticket would be issued in 1980. That is not the case now. With the change in enforcement the percent would have increased under your assumptions. Instead the percent has stayed the same with stronger enforcement and the total number of accidents has decreased by 33%. Stricter enforcement has made a difference in lives. Also, when you look at undue hardship, why don’t you talk to some of the victims of drunk drivers.

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Dec-03-13 2:21 PM

SC: So, in the last statement of your post, are you advocating the abolition of DWI/DWAI laws? Or some sort of change, and if so, what? Thanks for your thoughts & input on the subject.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Dec-03-13 1:12 PM

Umm it is an unusual topic when I agree with both of these prior posters...

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Dec-03-13 12:54 PM

There is a huge difference between being drunk and being legally drunk. In the former one is incapable of rational thought, judgement, and lacks body control; in the latter not so much so. It is interesting to note that the DWI laws have been essentially ineffective in curbing DWI deaths. According to the NHTSA in 1980 alcohol related fatalities accounted for 35% of all highway fatalities. Over the last 33 years this percentage has remained at 35% to 38%. One would expect that if harsher draconian laws were having an affect this percentage would change. Obviously, the only things these laws accomplish are line the pockets of the state and create undo hardship on the offenders.

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Dec-03-13 12:16 PM

This should be a no brainer!

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 9 of 9 comments

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
Remember my email address.


I am looking for:
News, Blogs & Events Web